Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

White House's Proposed NASA Budget Cuts Could Slash Funding by Nearly Half

Recent reports indicate that the Trump administration is planning to significantly reduce NASA's budget for the 2026 fiscal year, with proposed cuts approaching nearly 50% across the board for various NASA science programs. The alarming details have emerged from a set of 'passback' documents suggesting drastic reductions in several key areas: astrophysics would see funding drop to $487 million, heliophysics to $455 million, Earth science to $1.033 billion, and planetary science by more than 30% to $1.929 billion. Casey Dreier, the Chief of Space Policy at The Planetary Society, expressed a dire outlook, stating that these cuts could render many active missions and in-development projects irrelevant. In his words, it creates a scenario where fully operational spacecraft, designed to advance our understanding of the universe, could be left to 'tumble aimlessly' in space. The proposed budget continues to support iconic missions, such as the Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes, but would halt projects like the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, already built and undergoing tests, jeopardizing over two decades of investment. Furthermore, the complete shutdown of the Goddard Space Flight Center could result in major layoffs impacting around 10,000 employees. Such proposed cuts resonate with previous actions taken by the Trump administration, including layoffs at other federal agencies, raising concerns that this trend of drastic budget reductions may continue. Dreier emphasizes that public sector agencies like NASA are critical for non-profit-driven endeavors, such as deep space exploration. The looming cuts echo a broader strategy that challenges the future exploration and scientific discoveries that NASA has traditionally championed. The urgency of this matter extends beyond mere numbers; it touches the core of American scientific leadership and fundamental research.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
75/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  14  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The coverage of this news reflects a significant bias towards a negative portrayal of the proposed budget cuts, focusing on the catastrophic implications of these decisions without presenting potential justifications from the administration or alternative viewpoints. As a result, the article creates a sense of alarm and urgency, which may resonate with audiences who already have concerns regarding the Trump administration's priorities in space exploration. The tone and language used throughout the piece also emphasize the negative impacts of the cuts on scientific progress, reinforcing a judgmental viewpoint.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: