Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Weber State University Plans to Cut 17 Majors Amid Budget Cuts

In a bold move responding to state-imposed budget cuts, Weber State University (WSU) announced its intention to eliminate 17 academic majors, seven certificates, and eight minors. This restructuring is part of a broader initiative, mandated by recent legislation, aimed at reducing redundant programs across Utah's public higher education institutions. The state legislature collectively reduced the higher education budget by a staggering $60.5 million, prompting these schools to reevaluate their program offerings. The legislation, known as HB 265, indicates that schools can reclaim some of these funds if they remove 'low-performing' or 'inefficient' programs. WSU President Brad Mortensen assured current students in the affected programs would be allowed to complete their degrees, while new admissions to these programs will cease. Other institutions in the state are following suit; Utah State University plans to cut 14 academic programs altogether, and Utah Valley University has announced the closure of its Center for Intercultural Engagement due to budget constraints. The widespread nature of these cuts has generated significant concern among students, particularly regarding how these decisions were reached. Students voiced frustration over a perceived lack of transparency and communication in the decision-making process. Furthermore, the ramifications of these cuts extend beyond student concerns. Various positions within the faculty and staff will also be eliminated, translating to a major shake-up in the workforce at these institutions. As schools scramble to develop reinvestment plans by the end of May, many faculty members, especially those tenured, have expressed unease about their future. This situation raises critical questions about the direction of higher education in Utah and what these decisions mean for the students' educational pathways, especially in fields previously deemed essential. Cuts targeting humanities and social sciences amidst a push towards STEM and business degrees signal a shift that may not align with all student career aspirations, provoking discussions on the balance between funding efficiency and academic diversity.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
75/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  10  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The news piece exhibits a moderate to high degree of bias, primarily through its focus on the emotional responses of students and faculty regarding the cuts. It emphasizes student concerns and the perceived lack of transparency, which may influence readers to view the legislative decisions negatively. While factual details about the cuts are provided, the narrative leans heavily on personal stories that evoke emotional responses, potentially shaping public sentiment against the policy changes. This focus on qualitative experience overshadows quantitative data and analysis of the necessity or impact of the cuts, leading to a skewed representation of the events.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: