Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Waist Circumference: A Better Cancer Risk Indicator Than BMI in Men, Says Study

A new study conducted by researchers at Lund University indicates that waist circumference (WC) might be a more reliable risk marker for obesity-related cancers in men compared to the traditional body mass index (BMI). The study analyzed health data from 339,190 individuals between 1981 and 2019 and found that increased abdominal fat, as measured by waist size, could significantly raise a man's cancer risk. An extra 4-inch increase in waist size heightened the cancer risk by 25%, whereas a BMI increase of 3.7 only upped it by 19%. Interestingly, the same correlation was not as pronounced in women, suggesting differences in fat distribution patterns between genders. While men tend to store more visceral fat, which is metabolically more active, women often have more evenly distributed body fat. This visceral fat is thought to be linked to several health conditions, including cancer. The researchers propose that adding hip circumference to models could further elucidate gender differences in obesity-related cancer risks. The European Congress on Obesity recently discussed these findings, underlining the potential for waist measurements to offer additional risk information beyond BMI. However, it remains crucial for individuals to seek professional medical advice tailored to their personal circumstances.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
20/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  16  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The articles viewed have a low bias score because they primarily present factual information from a study reviewed by credible sources and focus on scientific insights rather than opinion. The judgmental tone is minimal, as the articles do not overtly favor one type of measurement over another but offer an academic perspective on the findings.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: