United Airlines Flight Forced to Return to Denver After Unusual Rabbit Strike Causes Engine Fire

In an extraordinary incident at Denver International Airport, a United Airlines Boeing 737-800, operating as Flight UA2325 to Edmonton, Canada, experienced an engine fire shortly after takeoff when a rabbit was reportedly ingested into the engine. The emergency situation, as confirmed by United Airlines and FAA investigators, led the flight crew to initiate an immediate return to Denver. Eyewitness accounts, including those from passengers who described loud bangs, significant vibrations, and recurring backfires from the affected engine, add a visceral dimension to this rare wildlife strike. Sources such as Fox Business, Fox8, the New York Post, and Aviation A2Z have provided detailed accounts of the event, highlighting not only the technical and safety challenges involved but also the emotional impact on those aboard. LiveATC recordings further corroborated the crew's communications as they discussed the unusual incident, with one pilot notably remarking, "Rabbit through the number 2, that'll do it." This event underscores the persistent challenge of wildlife strikes in aviation—a problem generally dominated by bird strikes, while rabbit strikes remain statistically rare. The incident has prompted an FAA investigation to better understand the sequence of events and to examine the safety protocols in place for such unlikely occurrences. With over 20,000 wildlife strikes in the US reported last year, this unusual case highlights the need for continued improvements in wildlife management around airports and rigorous pilot training to handle unforeseen emergencies. For subscribers and aviation enthusiasts alike, it is important to note that while media sources present the facts in detailed narratives, there is also a dramatization in the recounting of events. This analysis draws upon multiple sources including fact-checked news reports and official FAA data. Each source has contributed to a comprehensive view of the event, even though the repetition of details in some outlets could potentially lead to sensationalism. Overall, while the narrative is vivid and engaging, the reliance on real-time user accounts and live audio clips introduces a level of emotional intensity to the reporting. In conclusion, the coverage of this event by various media outlets has been thorough yet slightly sensational in parts, reflecting the rare and unpredictable nature of wildlife strikes in aviation. Subscribers can expect further updates as investigations proceed and more technical details become available. Follow us on social media and our Telegram Group for the latest aviation updates.