Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Two United Airlines Passengers File Federal Lawsuit Alleging Antisemitic Discrimination

Two passengers have alleged they were victims of antisemitic discrimination and unlawful detention on a United Airlines flight from Mexico to Houston on January 28th. The passengers, Yisroel Liebb and Jacob Sebbag, have filed a lawsuit claiming that one of the pilots forcibly removed Liebb from the restroom while making antisemitic remarks and that both were unjustly detained upon arrival in the US. The incident reportedly began when Liebb was using the aircraft’s lavatory for an extended period due to constipation. A flight attendant's initial actions were cooperative, but tension escalated when a pilot allegedly broke the lavatory lock, forcing Liebb out partially undressed. The lawsuit also cites physical harm, emotional distress, and violation of rights under the Montreal Convention. Upon detention, Homeland Security officers allegedly told the passengers they had no rights in the situation. The pair missed their connecting flight, incurring extra costs for accommodations and meals. The incident has provoked strong opinions online, with comments varying from defending the airline crew's need for safety protocols to criticizing alleged antisemitic behavior and the perceived absence of other passengers' viewpoints. United Airlines declined to comment on the matter. This lawsuit raises important discussions about passenger rights, religious discrimination, and airline protocol, which remain unresolved until further evidence is examined in court.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
65/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  20  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The report and surrounding comments predominantly favor the passengers' perspective and allegations, lacking comprehensive detail from United Airlines or other witnesses. The use of phrases like 'visibly enraged' suggests the tone leans toward believing the plaintiffs over the accused pilots and federal agents. The narrative's construction often induces emotional responses rather than delivering a balanced view, hence a bias score that reflects a moderate partiality toward the accusers.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: