The recent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis of President Donald Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" has raised serious concerns regarding its financial implications and potential societal impacts. The proposed tax cut initiative, touted as a means to stimulate economic growth, is projected to cut taxes by an astounding $3.7 trillion while simultaneously adding approximately $2.4 trillion to the national deficits over the span of a decade.
Released on a Wednesday, the CBO report reveals that the bill could also play a significant role in increasing the number of uninsured individuals by an estimated 10.9 million people by 2034. This figure includes about 1.4 million individuals lacking legal status who currently benefit from state-funded health programs.
The updated analysis indicates that the House version of the bill would contribute to a larger deficit than originally anticipated, surpassing earlier estimates that the net deficit increase would be around $2.3 trillion. The adjustments made to the bill, particularly the elevation of the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap, were essential for garnering the support needed for its passage within the closely divided House of Representatives. Consequently, this revision is now expected to yield a loss of approximately $128 billion in federal revenue over the next ten years.
Moreover, the reforms targeting Medicaid and various healthcare programs forecast a decline in spending by an additional $97 billion within the same timeframe, leading to a cumulative estimated cut of nearly $1.1 trillion when compared to initial proposals.
Despite the concerns raised by the CBO, the Trump administration and Republican lawmakers have denounced the findings, arguing that the CBO has underestimated the potential for increased federal tax receipts due to anticipated economic growth triggered by previous tax cuts enacted in 2017.
The bill—the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act"—narrowly passed the House with a contentious 215-214 vote on May 22, primarily bolstered by Republican support. However, the tight margin reveals the precarious landscape in Congress regarding fiscal policy, with only two Republican members voting against the measure due to apprehensions surrounding spending and rising deficits.
As the bill moves to the Senate, where Republicans hold a slim 53-47 majority, the potential for amendments looms large. Senators such as Rand Paul and Ron Johnson have openly expressed their resistance to the bill, citing growing concerns over its ramifications on the national debt.
Should the Senate modify the House-passed bill, further votes in the House will be essential before reaching the President's desk and becoming law. This ongoing negotiation reflects the broader debates within Congress over the balance between fiscal conservatism and economic stimulus, highlighting anticipated consequences for millions of Americans relying on health care services.
Bias Analysis
Key Questions About This Article
