Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Trump Under Fire for Use of Presidential Seal at Crypto Event

Controversy Surrounds Trump’s Memecoin Investor Dinner

President Donald Trump is currently facing intense scrutiny following his appearance at a private gathering for elite investors involved in his $TRUMP memecoin, where he was seen standing behind a lectern marked with the official presidential seal. This action raises potential legal ramifications, as it might be in violation of federal law regarding the unauthorized use of the presidential seal.

The event took place on Thursday at Trump National Golf Club in Virginia, attracting a crowd of 220 cryptocurrency investors. Per U.S. law, the presidential seal is strictly prohibited from being utilized in any form that could suggest government endorsement or sponsorship. Those found in violation of this statute can face serious penalties, including substantial fines and imprisonment for up to six months.

Trump's grand arrival by military helicopter to the venue added to the spectacle, as he went on to praise the attendees while delivering criticisms aimed at the Biden administration's approach to cryptocurrency regulation. When confronted with inquiries about any potential conflicts of interest stemming from his involvement with $TRUMP, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt emphasized that this gathering was a personal event and not hosted at the White House, stating, "It’s not taking place here at the White House."

Legal Concerns and Calls for Inquiry

This is not an isolated incident; Trump has previously utilized the presidential seal in contexts related to his private properties, including its use as golf markers at his clubs. This frequent appearance of the seal in non-official settings has raised eyebrows and led to legal inquiries.

On May 22, a group of 35 House members formally requested the Justice Department to investigate the potential legal ramifications surrounding the memecoin dinner. They sought clarity on whether the event may have contravened the federal bribery statute or the foreign emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution, which bans the acceptance of gifts from foreign entities without Congressional consent.

Reports indicate that a significant number of those attending the dinner might be foreign nationals, as they are connected to various crypto exchanges. This situation raises alarm as foreign entities are legally restricted from contributing to U.S. political campaigns. The letter to the Justice Department asserted that the promotional nature of the $TRUMP memecoin and the dinner—touted as providing exclusive access to the President—could potentially allow foreign governments to exert influence without proper transparency regarding their identities.

Shift in Trump’s Stance on Cryptocurrency

Trump’s foray into the cryptocurrency realm marks a notable shift from his previous skepticism during his first term. The $TRUMP memecoin, which launched earlier this calendar year, saw a significant spike in value to $74.34 before plummeting to $14.44 as of May 22. Notably, the guest list at the dinner included prominent figures, such as Tron founder Justin Sun, former NBA player Lamar Odom, and Asian crypto leaders Sangrok Oh and Vincent Liu.

Sun, a significant investor in the $TRUMP tokens with over $40 million at stake, also holds considerable influence in Trump's crypto ventures, being the key backer of World Liberty Financial, a firm with ties to Trump that is currently under regulatory scrutiny.

This gathering and the surrounding controversies highlight the ongoing tension between Trump's business interests and his role as a public servant, further igniting discussions regarding the ethical implications of his actions in the cryptocurrency space.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
55/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from   12   different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article maintains a relatively neutral tone; however, it conveys a sense of scrutiny towards Trump's actions and the implications of his use of the presidential seal. This focus on legalities and potential ethical breaches may suggest a slightly critical perspective, thus justifying a moderate bias score.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: