Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Trump Administration Cancels $400 Million in Grants to Columbia University Over Protests.

In a controversial move, the Trump administration has rescinded $400 million in grants to Columbia University due to the university's response to pro-Palestinian protests that occurred last year. The government issued demands that Columbia expel students involved in the demonstrations, a directive that the university complied with. This decision by the administration has left numerous medical and scientific studies at Columbia in limbo, as critical funding remains frozen. Columbia, with one of the largest university endowments in the U.S. at $14.8 billion, faces pressure to fill this financial void using its own resources. Critics argue that reliance on endowment funds, often restricted by donor intentions, could be unwise and might affect long-term financial health, echoing concerns by experts about the balance between immediate fiscal needs and future stability. Meanwhile, the broader context of the Trump administration’s actions points to an overarching agenda aimed at targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, as well as a specific focus on deporting pro-Palestinian international scholars. The administration’s assault on higher education is seen to extend beyond merely financial measures, with many university bodies, labor unions, and education professionals rallying against these actions. Lawsuits have been filed, and unions are planning additional mobilizations to counteract funding cuts and policy changes. This scenario is painted as a critical moment of resistance against a perceived authoritarian attack on higher education. The ongoing conflict underscores the significant political and economic pressures facing American universities today, which must navigate political edicts while striving to maintain academic freedom and financial stability.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
75/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  19  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article reads with a notable bias against the Trump administration, emphasizing its aggressive stance and negative impact on higher education. Descriptive language like 'assault on higher education,' 'authoritarian attacks,' and repeated mentions of potential negative outcomes create a heavily slanted narrative. The portrayal of union resistance and legal challenges further accentuates a narrative of oppositional forces against a common antagonist, thus showing a clear partiality. This approach skews the article towards an anti-Trump perspective, impacting its neutrality.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: