Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Time Magazine's 100 Most Influential People of 2025 List Surprises with No Indian Representation

In a notable oversight, Time Magazine's annual list of the 100 Most Influential People of 2025 did not feature any Indians, a surprising miss given the strong presence of Indian figures in previous years. Last year, Bollywood actress Alia Bhatt and Olympic medalist Sakshi Malik were included, raising questions about the criteria used for selection this time around. This year, the list featured Reshma Kewalramani, the Indian-origin CEO of Vertex Pharmaceuticals, recognized for her groundbreaking contributions to biotechnology and for leading the company to secure the first-ever FDA approval for a CRISPR-based therapy. Her story, as highlighted by author Jason Kelly, serves as an inspiration, emphasizing the importance of innovation in science and medicine. Reshma immigrated to the U.S. at the age of 11 and has made significant strides in an industry traditionally dominated by men, becoming the first female CEO of a large public biotech company. Besides Kewalramani, prominent leaders on the list include U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, showcasing a diverse range of global figures. However, the absence of a broader representation of Indian figures raises concerns about inclusivity, especially considering the impact and influence of Indian nationals in various fields worldwide. This situation prompts a reflection on how identities and achievements are evaluated and recognized in international platforms. As we dive deeper into the nuances of global recognition, it's essential to acknowledge the contributions of individuals from different backgrounds. The unnoticed achievements of Indian innovators and leaders signal an opportunity for a more balanced representation in future lists. This could potentially help elevate voices that deserve recognition on a global stage, fostering a more inclusive environment where diverse stories can inspire the next generation. Overall, Time's selection process, particularly in the context of inclusivity and diversity, warrants further scrutiny, as it shapes public perception and the narrative of who is influential. This analysis has been thoroughly reviewed by artificial intelligence, contributing to an objective evaluation of the news piece.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
60/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  22  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article expresses surprise and a degree of disappointment regarding the lack of Indian representation, which could skew the perception that the omission is a significant error or oversight. Moreover, there is a focus on the achievements of Kewalramani while contrasting it with the absence of other Indian figures, indicating a potential bias towards highlighting Indian influences more than necessary in a global context.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: