Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Thousands of UK deaths linked to ultra-processed foods, new analysis suggests

Recent research published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine has ignited concerns over the health implications of ultra-processed foods (UPFs), with estimates suggesting that nearly 17,781 premature deaths in the UK in 2018-19 could be attributed to their consumption. UPFs, which include items like processed meats, sugary drinks, packaged snacks, and mass-produced bread, are often laden with high levels of sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats. As per the findings, for every 10% increase in caloric intake from these foods, the risk of early death rises by approximately 3%. The study drew data from eight countries, revealing that UPFs constituted around 53% of energy intake in the UK—second only to the US, where the figure stood at 55%. In contrast, countries with lower UPF consumption, like Colombia, reported a mere 4% of premature deaths attributable to these foods. While the research indicates an alarming correlation between UPF consumption and health risks such as obesity, heart disease, diabetes, and others, experts urge caution, citing that the study does not definitively establish causation. Critics, including nutrition scientists and industry representatives, have expressed concerns over the definitions and classifications of UPFs. They argue that labeling all processed foods as detrimental may create confusion among consumers and potentially limit access to nutrient-rich options. The lead investigator, Eduardo Nilson, emphasizes the need for public health policies focusing on dietary changes to mitigate the consumption of such unhealthy foods. The conversation surrounding UPFs underscores a broader public health challenge: balancing convenience in food choices with nutritional value. As discussions around dietary recommendations evolve, researchers emphasize the necessity for further studies to clarify the causal mechanisms linking UPFs to poor health outcomes.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
40/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from   16   different sources.
Bias Assessment: The reporting shows a moderate level of bias, primarily in its emphasis on the negative health impacts of ultra-processed foods without offering extensive detail on other perspectives or counterarguments. While it appropriately references experts who question the findings and definitions associated with UPFs, the primary focus tends to lean towards the dangers related to these foods, which can skew public perception against them. Furthermore, the strong language used in describing their health implications may further influence readers' views on the subject.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: