Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Thousands of international students have their U.S. visa records terminated for minor infractions under the Trump administration.

In a startling development that has left thousands of international students in turmoil, the Trump administration has initiated a crackdown that has led to the termination of visa records for many, often due to minor legal infractions. Reports indicate that many students, including a master’s graduate from the University of South Florida, are now unable to study or work in the U.S. because of past encounters with law enforcement, some as trivial as traffic violations. The student expressed the drastic impact it has had on his life, as he had to resign from his job at the Florida Department of Revenue due to the termination of his visa status by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Immigration lawyers are claiming that ICE's actions are illegal, having violated their own regulations regarding student visa statuses. The Justice Department intervened by stating that people whose SEVIS (Student and Exchange Visitor Information System) records are terminated may not necessarily lose their legal status, contradicting guidance from the Department of Homeland Security. This situation has generated at least 60 lawsuits nationwide by international students concerned about their rights and the legality of ICE's actions. There appears to be a significant overreach from ICE, which reportedly ran the names of over a million international students through a federal database focused on criminal information, subsequently flagging around 6,400 individuals. Many of these flagged cases represent minor offenses or charges that were ultimately dismissed—raising concerns among advocates about the consistency and fairness of such actions. Federal Judge Ana Reyes criticized the lack of due process afforded to these students and suggested that ICE could have simply communicated with universities to assess compliance instead of resorting to these severe actions. As immigrant advocates warn of the chilling effect this could have on students’ willingness to engage with law enforcement or pursue any interactions that could lead to unintended consequences, the gravity of ICE's response has highlighted ongoing debates about immigration policy. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s comments have underscored the administration's unwavering stance on immediate visa repercussions for any criminal charges, reinforcing the perception of strict immigration enforcement without regard for the context of individual cases. Hence, with the recent restoration of records in the face of public backlash, one can expect that further policy adjustments may ensue that could potentially worsen the situation for international students going forward.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
75/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from   23   different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article displays substantial bias as it primarily focuses on the negative implications of the Trump administration's immigration policies for international students, portraying ICE's actions in a highly critical light. While factual information is presented about students' experiences, the tone conveys indignation and suggests unfair treatment without equally representing perspectives that might advocate for immigration enforcement. The opinions expressed by immigration lawyers and advocates hold significant weight, yet there is a lack of direct counters from government representatives to present a balanced view of the policy's intent.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: