Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

The U.S. Treasury Department Lifts Sanctions Against Tornado Cash Amid Legal and Technological Challenges

The U.S. Treasury Department has lifted sanctions against Tornado Cash, a cryptocurrency mixer accused of facilitating North Korean cybercriminal activities. Initially sanctioned for allegedly laundering over $7.6 billion in virtual assets, OFAC's August 2022 designation was overturned by a U.S. Fifth Circuit court ruling that OFAC overstepped its authority, as Tornado Cash's smart contracts could not be classified as 'property' under U.S. law. The Treasury's decision, informed by navigating evolving technological and legal frameworks, also delists over 100 Ethereum wallet addresses. This decision drew criticism from Coinbase's chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, who questioned the rationale for dismissing the need for a final court ruling, citing concerns that sanctions could potentially be reapplied. Despite the sanctions lift, privacy concerns persist, highlighted by initiatives like ETHTornado integrating Tornado Cash into MegaETH’s testnet for enhanced transaction privacy. Tornado Cash’s de-listing reflects ongoing debates over privacy, security, and regulatory compliance within the evolving cryptocurrency landscape. While the Treasury remains committed to safeguarding digital ecosystems from illicit actors like North Korea, the move underscores broader legal and regulatory challenges faced in the cryptocurrency domain.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
40/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  17  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article maintains a relatively neutral stance, presenting facts and statements from various stakeholders, such as the U.S. Treasury, legal criticisms from Coinbase, and technological implications within the crypto sphere. However, there is a slight bias reflected in emphasizing concerns over privacy and potential misuse while communicating assurances by regulatory authorities about ensuring compliance. The balance between innovation and regulation, and the depiction of opposing views, such as those from the Treasury and critics like Grewal, are fairly presented, but the narrative leans slightly towards favoring caution and legal oversight in the cryptocurrency space.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: