Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

The U.S.-China Trade War: Trump’s Tariffs and China’s Strategic Retaliation Raise Global Alarm

In a detailed examination of the ongoing trade war between the United States and China, experts outline a complex narrative in which President Trump’s aggressive tariff policies aim to revive domestic manufacturing at the risk of triggering a global economic slowdown. The news article extensively covers the disastrous potential of an extreme, prolonged trade conflict, with higher tariffs on Chinese goods potentially causing inflation and economic instability for millions of Americans. The analysis brings together expert voices like Harvard’s Jason Furman, former economic advisor under President Obama, who warns that the current policies undermine the core of American power by alienating longstanding allies. Other economists, including Jayant Menon and Zongyuan Zoe Liu, emphasize that the chaotic tariff regimes and sudden rollbacks could damage the United States’ high-tech hub status and expose consumers to higher prices on essential items. Throughout the article, attention is given to the delicate balance of domestic economic policy—highlighting the plight of blue-collar communities that have suffered from decades-long deindustrialization—and the broader implications for global supply chains and international alliances. As tariffs escalate to unprecedented levels (with Chinese exports facing duties as high as 145% and retaliatory U.S. levies at 125%), the risk of deepening economic rifts and even touching on potential financial and cyber escalations is apparent. Contributing to the complexity of the issue are shifts in policy that blur the lines between trade disputes and broader geopolitical tensions, suggesting that the trade war could soon bleed into other strategic areas, including technology and national security. The article is fortified with insights from multiple sources including the International Monetary Fund and analyses by major financial institutions such as Goldman Sachs, which project significant increases in costs for consumers and disruptions across manufacturing sectors. In addition, perspectives from institutions like the Council on Foreign Relations and think tanks like the American Enterprise Institute provide a counterbalance to claims that a return to 1970s-style manufacturing is realistic. Commentary also underscores how both American and Chinese companies might face drastic operational shifts due to these tariffs, and how altering supply chains might become a key strategy for survival in a rapidly changing economic landscape. From the perspective of journalism, this extensive coverage not only details the economic and political ramifications of the U.S.-China standoff but also reflects on historical patterns of international rivalry and global economic interdependence. As experts debate the potential for de-escalation and the eventual need for diplomatic negotiations, the story captures the high stakes involved—emphasizing that while both nations suffer under extreme protectionism, the long-term winners and losers remain difficult to predict. Overall, the article offers a comprehensive view of the trade war, replete with diverse expert opinions and data-backed projections that hint at both short-term disruptions and lasting shifts in global order.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
45/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  11  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The coverage is detailed and multi-sourced, quoting economists and experts from both domestic and international institutions. However, the language used at times—such as describing Trump’s policies as 'chaotic' and 'frenetic rollouts'—suggests a moderate level of judgment that leans towards a critical view of current U.S. trade policy. This imparts a bias score of approximately 45 on a scale of 0 to 100.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: