Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

The people of Sudan are trapped in siege-like conditions “with no escape, no hope, and often forced to face unspeakable abuse,” a senior official with the UN International Organization for Migration (IOM) said on Friday in Geneva.

As the conflict in Sudan simmers on, the recent statements from the UN and humanitarian officials highlight the dire situation facing civilians. Mohamed Refaat, the IOM Chief of Mission in Sudan, painted a grim picture of a capital ravaged by conflict and housing a populace under siege conditions. The resurgence of fighting between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) since April 2023 has led to significant civilian suffering, marked by ongoing displacements and unmet humanitarian needs. Reports indicate that essential infrastructure, including water and electric facilities, has been strategically targeted, leaving many, like Sarah, an elderly math teacher, trapped without means to escape the chaos around them. The urgency for humanitarian aid cannot be overstated, as the IOM seeks $250 million to help around 1.7 million people in Sudan, yet only a fraction of that amount has been acquired. As the UN highlights the plight of those fleeing Khartoum city—an exodus driven by fear and desperation—the overall humanitarian landscape remains bleak with the specter of continued violence looming. The international community's role in addressing this crisis will be critical moving forward, but future aid flows remain uncertain amid allegations against both warring factions for human rights abuses. The situation warrants the public's attention and urgent action, as voices like Refaat's draw on personal visits to the demolished city to urge world leaders not to overlook this growing humanitarian crisis.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
75/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  11  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The news carries a medium to high bias due to the strong emphasis on the suffering of civilians and the stark portrayal of the warring factions. While the reporting is based on factual statements from humanitarian officials, the selection of quotes and the emotional appeal can skew perceptions of the conflict by framing one group distinctly as abusers while highlighting the plight of the other group—civilians and aid workers—who are suffering from ongoing persecution.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: