The ongoing conflict in Sudan triggers catastrophic humanitarian crisis

The conflict in Sudan, which erupted two years ago, has escalated significantly, leading to widespread ethnic violence and what the United Nations describes as the world's worst humanitarian crisis. The recent capture of the Zamzam displacement camp by the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has intensified fears among aid organizations and the civilian population. The camp, which housed around half a million displaced individuals fleeing previous conflicts, has been described as having endured severe violations of human rights, with reports of looting, killings, and retaliation against civilians since the RSF's takeover in April 2025. "Witnesses reported horrifying scenes of violence and looting, while humanitarian access has been severely restricted due to ongoing conflicts and weaponization of aid," noted a UN report. This situation reflects the broader power struggle between the RSF and the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), each seeking dominance in a nation already facing dire economic challenges. The fragile alliance between the RSF and SAF, which formed during the coup in October 2021, has crumbled, as both sides compete over control and influence in Sudan. Humanitarian conditions are deteriorating; famine has been declared in some regions, disease risks are surging due to inadequate health services, and severe malnutrition has been reported among children. International responses have largely failed to stem the tide of violence, prompting analysts to question whether peace negotiations can genuinely address the complex dynamics at play, including regional power struggles fueled by external interventions from nations like the UAE and Egypt. In light of these multifaceted issues – compounded by an increase in ethnically targeted violence, widespread displacement (with over 300,000 people fleeing recently), and deteriorating living conditions – it is critical for international stakeholders to reassess their approach towards Sudan. Ongoing support for oppressive military forces rather than humanitarian efforts only serves to entrench the cycle of violence and suffering. A genuine commitment must be established to facilitate dialogue between factions and prioritize civilian welfare over military objectives.