As former President Donald Trump and his associates actively dismantle the international system that the United States once championed, the world faces a pivotal choice: either brace for disorder and submit to his demands or attempt to create a new framework that adheres to democratic ideals while largely excluding the US, leaving the possibility open for a future America that aligns more harmoniously with global expectations.
This scenario, once unthinkable, is becoming essential in light of the ongoing assault by Trumpism on two foundational pillars of the post-World War II global consensus: multilateralism and liberal democracy.
Understanding the Pillars of Global Governance
The first vital pillar, Multilateralism, emphasizes the importance of nations cooperating within established rules and frameworks to tackle global challenges. Trump’s administration has categorically rejected this principle, showing disdain for organizations such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), the United Nations (UN), and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The former president’s withdrawal from agreements like the Paris Climate Accord and the World Health Organization reveals a troubling trend towards unilateralism.
While the United States plays a dominant military role in NATO, it accounts for only 16% of its budget—a figure comparable to Germany’s contributions. Trump’s erroneous characterizations of NATO as "obsolete" have further eroded trust among allies.
Moreover, his administration’s tariff policies undermine not just trade relations but also economic stability. Estimates suggest that tariffs on key partners like China, Canada, and Mexico have placed an annual burden of over $1,200 on the average American household, recalling historical instances, such as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, which exacerbated the Great Depression.
Throughout history, multilateral institutions have served as bastions against the chaos of nationalism, established post-World War II to prevent another global conflict.
The Necessity of Liberal Democracy
The second foundational pillar, Liberal Democracy, is increasingly being redefined by Trumpism as a mere popularity contest, where winning an election justifies unrestricted rule and the blatant disregard for civil liberties, judicial integrity, and press freedoms. This ideological shift reflects the growing tendencies seen in authoritarian regimes worldwide.
Democratic backsliding has been a consistent trend globally, with numerous reports highlighting this regression in nearly 60 countries over consecutive years. The decline in democratic norms coincides with a rise in the appeal of illiberalism, fueled by populist rhetoric that sensationalizes various societal issues like immigration—all while sidestepping the genuine harm that autocratic governance inflicts on citizens.
This troubling reality challenges the United States’ historical role as a champion of liberty, and presents an alarming question: what if an America that once inspired hope becomes a symbol of dominance and intimidation instead?
Options for Global Leadership
Faced with an America retreating from its postwar responsibilities, the global community can explore multiple responses. One path could involve acquiescing to the pressures exerted by a bullying American administration. Another, perhaps wiser, choice would be to maintain national dignity and patiently await a return to collaborative governance. Finally, a more assertive strategy could include challenging Trump’s rhetoric on multiple fronts, encouraging a recognition among American citizens of the failures inherent in populist policies.
As European nations boost their defense budgets and reassess their strategic alliances in anticipation of an erratic US leadership, a new geopolitical landscape may be emerging—one capable of fostering alliances that better advocate for democratic principles.
The battle unfolding before us hinges not merely on political ignorance but on a tactical finesse displayed by Trump, who has skillfully manipulated public sentiment for his own objectives. This approach contradicts the longstanding values the United States has represented worldwide for over a century, positioning America as merely another power flexing its influence in dominant terms.
Regardless of future outcomes, clarity may ultimately require a shift in global perceptions regarding the United States. If that necessitates sidelining the nation temporarily, it may serve as an appropriate response to the violate behavior of the world’s former standard-bearer for democracy and freedom.
Bias Analysis
Key Questions About This Article
