Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

The First Giant Fungus on Earth Belonged to a Previously Unknown Life Form

A groundbreaking revelation by UK researchers suggests that Prototaxites, towering ancient organisms once thought to be fungi, belong to an enigmatic and entirely separate lineage in the tree of life. Discovered over 165 years ago, these mysterious fossils have puzzled scientists due to their colossal size and unique structure that defies easy classification. Previously identified as ancient fungi, recent studies indicate that these organisms were part of an extinct branch of multicellular terrestrial eukaryotes, unparalleled in today's biodiversity. Fossil remnants from the Devonian period analyzed by the researchers provided critical insights, revealing anatomical and chemical compositions inconsistent with known fungi, plants, or algae. The current understanding proposes Prototaxites as a marker of an uncharted evolutionary path, underscoring the unknown complexities of Earth's biological history. Such discoveries challenge conventional views, highlighting the tentative and evolving nature of scientific classification. Yet, as this study awaits peer review, the discourse surrounding these 'giants of the past' continues, tempting paleontologists to rethink established evolutionary paradigms.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
15/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  25  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The reporting on this study is primarily neutral and factual, focusing on the scientific analysis without apparent bias towards any particular theoretical perspective. The language is balanced, presenting different hypotheses and acknowledging the study's preliminary nature since it hasn't undergone peer review yet. Any minor bias may stem from the emphasis on the novelty and potential impact of the findings, which is typical in scientific journalism to captivate the audience's interest.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: