The federal government alleges the University of Oregon and other universities have limited access to a doctoral degree mentoring program based on race.

The U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has launched investigations into 45 universities, including Montana State University, for potentially violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act by limiting graduate program access based on race. This move follows a broader national conversation about race and equity in higher education, particularly against the backdrop of the Trump administration's commitment to dismantling diversity efforts that they argue exclude white and Asian American students. On February 14, 2025, the OCR reaffirmed schools' civil rights obligations to eliminate racial preferences in educational programs. Accusations primarily focus on partnerships with The PhD Project, an organization designed to assist underrepresented students in acquiring business doctoral degrees. Critics argue that such initiatives result in 'race-exclusionary practices,' which fundamentally clash with Title VI's mandates against racial discrimination. As the investigations unfold, significant public institutions like Ohio State University and Cornell University find themselves in precarious positions, facing scrutiny over how their partnerships with The PhD Project might affect the inclusivity of their high-value academic programs. In response, many universities, like Montana State, have underscored their compliance with federal laws while expressing surprise at the sudden notice from the federal agency. Education Secretary Linda McMahon has been vocal in her stance, stating, 'Students must be assessed according to merit and accomplishment, not prejudged by the color of their skin.' This sentiment encapsulates the administration's approach to race in education, igniting discussions about the merits of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs versus traditional merit-based assessments. However, the investigations are not without contention. Opponents argue that ending race-conscious programs could hinder the progress made towards diversifying educational environments that historically marginalized students. Furthermore, as OCR continues its inquiries, the implications could extend beyond mere funding concerns, potentially reshaping the landscape of higher education and employment in America. Additionally, confusion surrounding university involvement has created a wave of mixed responses, particularly illustrated by the misidentification of the University of Tulsa in the original press release, which highlights the complexities and challenges inherent in managing communications during such sensitive investigations. Given the significance of these investigations, the potential repercussions for universities found in violation could include losing federal funding, raising critical questions about how institutions will navigate compliance with civil rights laws while striving to maintain diversity in their academic offerings. This article has been analyzed and reviewed by artificial intelligence to ensure a thorough understanding of its implications. The unfolding narrative in higher education suggests a pivot that could redefine how institutions pursue diversity, equity, and inclusivity moving forward.