Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

The crypto market has felt the brunt of Trump's tariff turmoil.

In an ongoing battle of economic perspectives, the cryptocurrency market is experiencing severe fluctuations as a direct consequence of President Donald Trump's controversial tariff policies. As Bitcoin faces heightened bearish momentum, with testing support at approximately $81,302, prominent economist Peter Schiff is vocalizing dire forecasts for cryptocurrency’s future amidst the brewing financial crisis of 2025. In his latest critique, Schiff starkly warns that the chaos stemming from tariff wars could potentially spell doom for Bitcoin and other digital currencies. Schiff’s prediction follows recent market instabilities, including a market event dubbed “Black Monday,” which witnessed a substantial loss of gains across both stocks and cryptocurrencies. With Bitcoin’s origin story linked to the financial turmoil of 2008, Schiff posits that today's economic conditions could reverse that legacy, turning Bitcoin from a potential savior into a casualty of the emerging crisis. Interestingly, while Schiff aligns himself with gold as a 'safe haven', the recent performance of gold surging past $3,175 per ounce further adds credence to his arguments. Analysts emphasize this is a period of volatility driven by macroeconomic factors, coupled with a noticeable $772 million outflow from Bitcoin ETFs, indicating a major shift in investor sentiment. Jayakrishnan Bhaskar, an analyst based in Dubai, and Avinash Shekhar, CEO of Pi42, both echo these sentiments, shedding light on the fragile state of the U.S. economy, the ramifications of aggressive tariff strategies, and the cautious stance that investors are currently adopting. They note that while temporary reprieves in tariffs may provide some short-term relief, the underlying volatility and uncertainty remain pervasive. Schiff's warnings are further emphasized with a poignant retort regarding an alleged decline in U.S. negotiating power as perceived by global trade partners. This debate extends beyond economics, as personal animosities are at play with Schiff’s ongoing public feud with Bitcoin advocates like Michael Saylor. Schiff leveraged recent price dips in Bitcoin to mock Saylor, questioning the integrity and resolve of Bitcoin supporters. The overarching sentiment, as illustrated by the contrasting views of various experts, speaks to an electrifying divide in opinions on cryptocurrency’s viability as a hedge against traditional financial instability. Many traditional investors resonate with Schiff's viewpoint, yet a robust counter-narrative exists among crypto advocates, igniting a clash between the conventional and the contemporary. As Bitcoin tests critical resistance and support levels, the potential for recovery is ambiguous, leading investors to maintain a sharp focus on macroeconomic updates that will shape cryptocurrency's trajectory moving forward. Ultimately, while Schiff paints a dire outlook, the evolving landscape indicates that the narrative of cryptocurrency, particularly Bitcoin, is far from settled. Investors need to be attentive to both perspectives, allowing them to navigate the intricate dance of risks and rewards in the volatile world of cryptocurrency.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
85/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  25  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article showcases high bias primarily through the emphatic portrayal of Peter Schiff's negative views on Bitcoin and cryptocurrency at large. While it presents some counterpoints from crypto advocates, the overall tone and emphasis lean more heavily in favor of traditional investment wisdom and caution against cryptocurrency, indicating a critical perspective that may not fully represent the optimistic outlook shared by many cryptocurrency supporters.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: