Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Texas Education Agency Releases Accountability Ratings After Two-Year Delay

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) unveiled its 2023 A-F accountability ratings for schools and districts, following a two-year period of legal challenges that delayed this critical information. The ratings, which assess student performance based on the 2022-2023 academic year, reveal that overall performance has decreased compared to last year. Approximately 18% of campuses received an 'A', 32% a 'B', 31% a 'C', 14% a 'D', and 6% an 'F'. This downturn in ratings stems largely from updated metrics that reflect a decline in student academic growth rates. The TEA's revised standards were met with resistance from over 120 school districts, which argued that they were not given adequate notification about these changes that heavily impacted their ratings. One noteworthy point is that despite the statewide drop in ratings, over 305 high-poverty campuses earned an 'A', indicating that the accountability system recognizes high standards regardless of student demographics. This newfound transparency, as echoed by Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath, could positively influence educational outcomes, although many educators express concern over the reliance on standardized tests, which they believe do not accurately reflect overall student learning. Statements from educational leaders like Katy ISD's Superintendent Ken Gregorski highlight frustrations about being penalized despite academic growth, indicating a growing call for a reevaluation of how these metrics are established and implemented. The results underscore the ongoing debate surrounding educational accountability and the adequacy of funding in an evolving educational landscape.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
65/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  17  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The bias score of 65 reflects a moderate level of bias. This score was influenced by the presence of advocacy voices from educators and education associations who criticize the accountability system's reliance on standardized testing while also highlighting that the reporting tends to focus on negative aspects of academic performance changes without sufficient context. While factual elements regarding the ratings and legal issues are presented, there is a noticeable emphasis on the criticisms from educators, indicating a perspective that is at times less neutral and more advocacy-driven.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: