Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio Claims State Department Revoked 300 Student Visas, Calling Students 'Lunatics'

On March 27, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the State Department had revoked over 300 student visas, alleging that these students were 'lunatics' and suggesting that they sought entry into the U.S. for ulterior motives beyond education, including participation in protests and vandalism. The revocations reportedly affected many international students across various U.S. universities, specifically targeting those involved in protests against the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Recent communications from the State Department indicate that the revocations may also include individuals with minor legal infractions. Educational institutions have expressed confusion, with many administrators stating they have yet to receive clear notifications about individual cases, leaving many students in a state of uncertainty regarding their legal status. Advocacy groups, including the ACLU, have initiated lawsuits on behalf of affected students, claiming violations of due process as many did not receive adequate explanations for their visa terminations. The actions taken by the State Department have sparked widespread concerns about the broader implications of targeting students based on speech and actions that are legally protected in the U.S., raising fundamental questions about the future of academic freedom and the protections afforded to both citizens and noncitizens under U.S. law. In a climate of increased scrutiny and fear among international students, many are reportedly taking extra precautions, such as carrying their immigration paperwork at all times and fearing repercussions for their political opinions. This situation highlights the precarious position of international students in a country where their rights appear increasingly threatened by political agendas that conflate education with dissidence.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
85/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  16  different sources.
Bias Assessment: This news reflects a substantial bias against the actions of the U.S. government, particularly under the Trump administration. The language used, particularly the term 'lunatics,' signals deep judgment against the individuals affected while portraying the government's actions as punitive and intrusive. The reports of legal action and student fear further develop a narrative of governmental overreach and a chilling effect on free speech. Overall, the article paints a negative picture of the government's handling of international student affairs, indicating significant bias towards the views of affected students and their advocates.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: