Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Revolut Refuses to Reimburse Customer for Crypto Loss Due to Administrative Error

In a recent incident that highlights the complexities and risks of the cryptocurrency landscape, Tzoni Raykov, a Bulgarian national and oil engineer, reported losing $1,500 worth of the stablecoin USDC while transferring it to his Revolut account. The mishap occurred after Raykov tested the transfer process with a smaller amount of $10, which was successfully processed using the Polygon POS (proof of stake) network. However, during his subsequent attempt to transfer a larger sum, he mistakenly selected the 'Polygon (bridged)' network. This choice resulted in the conversion of his USDC into its bridged version, USDC.e, which Revolut does not support. Consequently, the funds have neither arrived in his account nor been returned to him. Revolut's explanation to the BBC stated that recovering unsupported assets does not fit within the scope of their operations, citing standard industry practices and the technical challenges involved in catering to every combination of token and blockchain. Raykov disputes that the instructions provided by Revolut were adequately specific, expressing frustration over the company's response and indicating that he will continue to pursue the matter. His statements convey a sense of injustice regarding how financial institutions handle such situations, where customers are often left vulnerable to losses due to technicalities in service offerings. This incident raises important questions about customer protections and service transparency in the evolving fintech and cryptocurrency sectors, as many individuals are still unfamiliar with the nuances of various blockchain technologies. As digital assets grow in popularity, the expectations for user-friendly guidance from financial firms become paramount. Raykov's experience underscores the need for clearer communication from companies like Revolut regarding how users can avoid similar pitfalls in the future. The outcome of this case could potentially influence broader industry practices surrounding customer service protocols for digital assets and accountability in administering customer transactions.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
30/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  11  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The report showcases a moderate level of bias, primarily stemming from the emphasis on Raykov's grievances over Revolut's policies without a more balanced presentation of the company's rationale regarding the industry practices they adhere to. While the challenges faced by consumers in the crypto space are real, the framing tends to suggest negligence on Revolut's part without fully exploring the complexities that come with supporting multiple token versions and networks.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: