Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Overwatch 2 Introduces Competitive Hero Bans for Season 16 Set to Launch on April 22

In an anticipated update, Blizzard Entertainment has unveiled the mechanics of the Competitive Hero Ban system that will be implemented in Overwatch 2 starting with Season 16: Stadium on April 22. This new feature aims to improve the competitive experience by allowing players to ban certain heroes they perceive to be either overwhelmingly powerful or exceedingly annoying, a common practice seen in other games such as League of Legends. Each player will have the opportunity to select a ‘Preferred Hero’ at the beginning of the ban phase, signaling to their teammates whom they would like to play. Following this, players will concurrently select three heroes they wish to ban, employing a ranked choice system. The first choice carries the most weight in determining which heroes are ultimately banned, with the second and third choices carrying lesser weight. The system is designed to ensure that the player experience is both streamlined and strategic. The interesting aspect of this implementation is the removal of visibility into opponents' selections during the ban phase. Blizzard has thoughtfully crafted this feature to discourage the targeting of heroes based solely on what opposing players might favor, thus fostering a more strategic and thoughtful approach to banning. Gavin Winter, the Senior Systems Designer at Blizzard, stated that this system aims to give players agency in their roles without diminishing the value of niche picks. Each team can potentially ban up to four heroes (two from each team), while still adhering to a limit of two banned heroes per role. The complexity of this system sheds light on Blizzard's commitment to evolving Overwatch 2 into a more balanced competitive platform. The developers aim to monitor this system closely, using data gathered from hero bans to better understand community sentiment regarding hero balance and frustration points. This change is a significant step towards adapting Overwatch 2's competitive experience to meet players' demands for a fair and engaging environment. As exciting as these changes are, they must be approached with caution. Community reception will ultimately determine the success of this new system. Past experiences within the gaming community have shown that changes, no matter how well-intentioned, can be met with backlash if they do not resonate well with players. This strategic overhaul may provide better game balance but will also need to address the players' experience of feeling locked out of favorite heroes. Listening to community feedback following the rollout will be critical for Blizzard In summary, the implementation of hero bans in Overwatch 2’s Competitive Play marks a pivotal moment for the franchise, potentially enhancing player engagement and satisfaction. The move towards allowing players to dictate their competitive environment reflects a growing trend in the gaming industry towards increased player agency. However, this system's effectiveness will depend heavily on community feedback and adaptability post-implementation.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
25/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  12  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article provides a balanced view of the new Competitive Hero Ban system in Overwatch 2, detailing the mechanics and the rationale behind its introduction without showing favoritism towards any particular aspect. It highlights both the positive implications and potential drawbacks, indicating low bias. However, it leans slightly towards a positive angle in the analysis of Blizzard's intentions, warranting a score of 25 for minor bias towards the developers' perspective.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: