Public Outcry Over Disturbing Incident at Gengdan Institute
A recent incident at Gengdan Institute University College in Beijing has sparked considerable outrage after a female student reported that she was asked to remove her trousers as proof of menstruation to obtain sick leave. This shocking allegation has triggered a wave of criticism from the public, raising serious questions about privacy rights and the treatment of female students within educational institutions.
On May 15, the unnamed student posted a video detailing her experience at the on-campus clinic, which quickly gained traction on social media. In the viral video, the student is seen confronting a staff member who allegedly confirmed that to secure a sick note, girls would need to show physical evidence of their menstruation. The staff member reportedly stated, "Basically yes, this is a school rule." Such a directive, if true, introduces a deeply invasive and humiliating requirement for students seeking medical leave.
The Gengdan Institute has defended its staff by asserting that proper protocols were followed. In an official statement released shortly after the incident, the college maintained that the staff had inquired about the student's physical condition and proceeded with the necessary diagnosis only after obtaining her consent. They emphasized that no instruments or physical examinations were conducted during the interaction.
However, the institution's justification has not quelled the backlash. Critics argue that the school's policy represents an unwarranted invasion of privacy and an excessive exertion of control over students' personal health matters. A clinic staff member, known only by the surname Xu, explained that the policy was aimed at preventing repeated misuse of sick leave, with claims of students falsely stating they were menstruating to take time off.
This statement, however, has only intensified the public's indignation. Many have taken to platforms like Weibo to voice their disgust, questioning the logic behind such humiliating protocols. One user pointed out that instead of such degrading measures, simply maintaining a record of sick leave requests could sufficiently address any concerns about potential abuse.
Moreover, calls for a more respectful policy regarding menstruation-related sick leave have emerged from the student herself, who later shared a follow-up video confirming she had received documentation from a hospital without the invasive requirement initially stated. “I am simply asking for a reasonable and respectful policy on how women can request leave during their period,” she asserted, urging the school to clarify whether such humiliating conditions are formally documented.
The incident stands as a glaring reminder of the systemic issues surrounding women's health policies in educational settings. As discussions continue, the Gengdan Institute has warned that it will consider legal action against those disseminating what it claims to be distorted information about the incident.
As more details unfold, the conversation surrounding privacy rights and the treatment of female students at universities gains urgency. This troubling case has catalyzed many individuals to share their experiences, stressing the need for a reevaluation of policies that hinder dignity and respect for women’s health.
Bias Analysis
Key Questions About This Article
