Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

NIH Pauses Awards to Universities Amid Trump Administration Funding Freeze

Officials within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have directed the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to halt all funding awards to several prestigious universities, including Northwestern University (NU), Columbia University, Brown University, Cornell University, and Harvard University. This directive follows an internal email from Michelle Bulls, director of a NIH compliance office, that details the existing funding freeze initiated by the Trump administration, which froze approximately $790 million in federal funding for NU on April 8. Notably, NU received $519.6 million in NIH grants throughout 2024. As of the latest communications, the Trump administration has not provided clarity regarding the reasons for the funding freeze or what specific actions these universities may need to take to regain eligibility for funding. University President Michael Schill expressed deep concern over the implications of this funding freeze, emphasizing the potentially disastrous effects on critical research and the broader impact on both researchers and the communities dependent on their work. The email that circulated among NIH officials cautioned against disclosing information about the freeze to the affected universities. This situation is compounded by ongoing investigations concerning Title VI violations linked to allegations of antisemitism at these institutions, showcasing the increasingly complex relationship between academia, governmental funding, and political controversies.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
60/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  19  different sources.
Bias Assessment: This news article displays a moderate level of bias, largely due to its focus on the impacts of the funding freeze on universities without thoroughly exploring the administration's reasons behind the decision or considering any opposing viewpoints. The language used by university officials, which highlights the emotional and financial distress of researchers and the potential negative outcomes of the freeze, leans towards portraying the freeze negatively. Moreover, the mention of the ongoing investigations hints at a darker political context, which may shape reader perceptions. The sourcing primarily reflects institutional responses rather than presenting a balanced view that includes perspectives from officials of the Trump administration and supporters of the funding freeze.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: