Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

National Grid Exec Asserts Heathrow Had Sufficient Backup Power Amidst Substation Fire

The recent power outage that affected Heathrow Airport, Europe's largest airport by passenger numbers, resulting in over 1,300 flight cancellations, has shed light on concerns regarding the infrastructure's resilience. The disruption was sparked by a fire at an electricity substation in Hayes. Despite this critical incident, John Pettigrew, the chief executive of National Grid, asserted there was no lack of capacity as backup substations were available to cater to the 83.9 million annual passengers. John Pettigrew emphasized the resilience built into the system and its capacity to support Heathrow fully, even if one substation fails. However, in a conflicting response, Heathrow officials highlighted the unprecedented nature of the incident, stressing the difficulties involved in safely rebooting hundreds of critical systems. The incident recurs at a time when a decade-old report by consultancy Jacobs flagged weaknesses in Heathrow's electrical supply. There's an investigation led by the London Fire Brigade, as counter-terrorism departments initially analyzed the situation, but the fire was determined as non-suspicious. Amid debates over whether this power cut was avoidable or a pure accident, the event underscores the pressing need to review and potentially bolster infrastructure resilience against unforeseen disruptions. Commentary: This incident not only raises questions about Heathrow's infrastructure resilience but also about the preparedness and response systems of critical infrastructure points globally. As infrastructure ages, proactive measures, continuous reviews, and prompt action could drastically mitigate issues stemming from similar disruptions in the future.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
30/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  12  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article provides well-rounded perspectives from both National Grid and Heathrow officials, reflecting multiple facets of the problem without clear deviation toward one point of view. However, the references to past reports and assumptions about vulnerability might slightly tilt the narrative toward concern over infrastructure resilience. The mention of potential sabotage, while investigated and dismissed, adds mild speculation that could polarize the reader's perception, slightly increasing the bias score.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: