Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

NASA Astronauts Accept Blame for Starliner Mishap, Express Confidence in Future Missions

NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams took part responsibility for the unsuccessful Boeing Starliner test flight. The two astronauts returned on a SpaceX spacecraft after spending over nine months at the International Space Station, a much longer period than initially planned. During a news conference, Wilmore candidly admitted that he could have asked more pertinent questions that might have averted the mishap. Both astronauts expressed their willingness to fly on the Starliner again, trusting in the corrections Boeing plans to implement. The Starliner capsule faced significant issues, like thruster malfunctions and helium leaks, necessitating a knowledge exchange session with Boeing leadership to address the problems. NASA might require another test flight before the Starliner can carry astronauts again. Notably, this incident highlights the competition between Boeing and SpaceX to provide reliable transportation to the ISS, a project with a ticking clock since the ISS is scheduled to be replaced by privately-operated laboratories within five years.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
10/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  12  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article provides a factual recount of the sequence of events leading up to and following the Starliner mishap. While it contains political context, the article refrains from taking a stance on the administration's involvement and focuses on the technical and operational aspects. The narrative offers insights through the direct quotations of the astronauts involved, which adds credibility and minimizes bias. The mention of the Trump administration appears objective, used to portray the complexity and non-linear nature of decision-making in space explorations. The article lacks a strong bias as it aims to present a comprehensive view of the event's technical details and astronaut perspectives.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: