Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Millions of people with roof solar panels could find it easier to buy a home battery under new Labor scheme.

In a promising development for renewable energy enthusiasts, the Albanese government has proposed a Cheaper Home Batteries Program set to launch on July 1. This program aims to provide a 30% discount on household battery systems valued at approximately $2.3 billion, intended to benefit over one million Australian homes by 2030. The initiative, deemed by supporters as a 'bill-buster,' is expected to facilitate significant savings on energy costs for households equipped with solar panels, potentially saving up to $1100 annually on power bills. However, the impact and accessibility of this plan are under scrutiny. Critics have expressed concerns that the scheme predominantly favors homeowners, leaving renters and low-income families without support, thereby exacerbating existing inequalities in energy access. Edwina MacDonald from the Australian Council of Social Service highlighted that the proposed subsidies may not reach those most in need—essentially, those who can't afford battery systems at all. Additionally, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has voiced skepticism, predicting that the capital cost burden may still be too high after the discount is applied, threatening to zero out the intended economic relief for the lower-middle class. Despite this, energy analysts have noted that broad adoption of battery systems could stabilize grid pressure during peak demand times, potentially benefiting all consumers by driving down prices. Overall, while the initiative has garnered applause from renewable energy advocates, it is vital to ensure equitable access across socioeconomic lines to fully realize its intended benefits.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
65/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from   17   different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article presents a moderately high bias score due to the clear differentiation in benefits between homeowners and renters. While it includes perspectives from advocates and critics, the framing may suggest a bias toward renewable energy initiatives without sufficiently addressing potential disadvantages for vulnerable demographics. There is also a noticeable frustration and critique of political opposition, which could influence reader perception.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: