Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Maryland Executes Epic Comeback to Defeat Alabama in Double Overtime, Advances to Sweet 16

In an exhilarating showdown at the NCAA Women's Tournament, Maryland overcame a significant 17-point deficit to win against Alabama with a final score of 111-108 in double overtime. This incredible game secured Maryland's position in the Sweet 16, making it their fourth appearance in five years. Despite Alabama's Sarah Ashlee Barker achieving a career-high of 45 points, Maryland's collective effort, led by Shyanne Sellers and Sarah Te-Biasu, turned the tide of the game. Sellers registered crucial free throws to bolster the Terrapins' victory, while Te-Biasu demonstrated remarkable resilience by playing nearly the entire game and securing key points. The thrilling match was characterized by chaotic play, turnovers, and dramatic scoring stretches, creating an unforgettable NCAA tournament moment. Both teams displayed high-level competition, showcasing the unpredictability and excitement of March Madness.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
25/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  6  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The news article is largely factual and focuses on game statistics, player performances, and the dramatic progression of the match, maintaining objectivity in its coverage. There is a slight lean towards celebrating Maryland's victory, which is natural in sports analysis of a winning side. However, the narrative also includes commendations of Alabama's efforts, particularly highlighting Barker's impressive performance. The use of descriptive language to convey excitement and intensity is typical in sports journalism and does not indicate significant bias. As such, the article demonstrates minimal bias and maintains an engaging yet factual recount of the event.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: