Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Maryland Beats Colorado State at the Buzzer to Advance to Sweet 16

In an electrifying NCAA tournament matchup, Maryland secured a 72-71 victory over Colorado State with a dramatic buzzer-beater shot by freshman center Derik Queen. The win propels Maryland to the Sweet 16 for the first time since 2016, where they will face Florida. The game highlighted Queen's confidence as he demanded the ball for the final play, leading his team to triumph with a fadeaway jump shot. However, the win was not without controversy, as debates arose over a potential travel violation not called by the referees. Despite this, Maryland's resilience and teamwork were evident as all starters scored in double digits. Notably, Julian Reese joined a selective group of Maryland players with over 1,000 career rebounds. The victory was a testament to Maryland's determination to advance further in the tournament, reinforcing the excitement and unpredictability that 'March Madness' brings. From a journalistic perspective, the narrative focuses heavily on the drama and excitement of the game, capturing the essence of college basketball's allure. There is acknowledgment of the officiating controversy, presenting multiple viewpoints but ultimately emphasizing the outcome's impact on both teams. In my analysis, while the story crafts an engaging recount of the game's events, it leans towards highlighting Queen and Maryland's triumph, potentially underplaying Colorado State's efforts. Moreover, the narrative largely accepts the no-call on the travel violation without delving deeply into implications for fairness in the game, which could reflect a mild bias towards celebrating the winning side's narrative.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
30/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  24  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The bias score is relatively low, at 30 out of 100, indicating a moderate but not overpowering partiality. The bias predominantly stems from a favorable angle towards Maryland's victory and Derik Queen's heroics, which might overshadow Colorado State's commendable performance and the controversy surrounding the travel call. Additionally, the emotional language used to describe Queen's confidence and the celebration of positive outcomes for Maryland players slightly tilt the piece towards a more favorable depiction of Maryland. However, the article does acknowledge the officiating controversy by presenting different perspectives, which helps maintain some degree of balance.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: