Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Late Advertisement Splurge by the Coalition Fails to Prevent Election Wipeout

In a revealing turn of events during the recent electoral battle in Australia, the Coalition's late advertising blitz could not salvage their fortunes as they faced a significant defeat, particularly against Labor’s shifting strategies. Most notably, Labor has responded to the challenge posed by ousted Liberal leader Peter Dutton by ramping up its attack ads in the final weeks of the campaign. According to data from Adgile, a measurement firm, the advertising expenditures highlighted a stark narrative: the Coalition spent a total of $20.7 million on video advertising, significantly less than Labor’s $24 million and Clive Palmer's Trumpet of Patriots' $24.1 million, which astonishingly yielded no seats. This discrepancy underscores a strategic miscalculation as the Coalition increased its spending dramatically in the campaign's closing week, indicating they had underestimated the necessity of consistent messaging. Throughout the campaign's first weeks, Labor focused on articulating its policy positions, whereas the Coalition largely relied on attack ads against Labor leader Anthony Albanese. By the end, however, the roles reversed with Labor employing significant resources to highlight potential cuts to health services under a Dutton-led government. Political analysts, like Shaun Lohman of Adgile, have pointed out that Australian political parties are becoming increasingly sophisticated in their voter targeting, mirroring US election strategies. Interestingly, while the large-scale advertisements were expected to sway public opinion, voters appeared to contradict expectations, particularly for far-right candidates like those from Clive Palmer and Pauline Hanson’s parties. Hanon’s One Nation received only a 6.15% vote share, marginally above its previous standing. This suggests a robust rejection of the far-right influence, where despite Palmer's substantial financial investment, the party floundered with only 1.85% of the vote. The election night also marked the conclusion of Antony Green's tenure at ABC, as he reported technical glitches amidst a viewership of over 4 million. Furthermore, the Coalition's optimistically projected preferences from One Nation that were expected to flow their way proved significantly overestimated, as voter sentiment leaned towards dissatisfaction with far-right politics. Dutton’s commitments earlier in the campaign to adopt a hardline on cultural issues and immigration seemed ineffective as the electorate rejected these platforms in favor of a more decisive Labor victory. The results emphasize a shifting political landscape in Australia, where campaigns succeed or fail not just on expenditure, but on their alignment with voter sentiment and strategic messaging.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
65/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from   16   different sources.
Bias Assessment: The coverage exhibits a moderate bias by selectively highlighting the shortcomings of the Coalition and strong performance of Labor, which potentially influences readers' perceptions. The language utilized suggests a negative framing of the Coalition’s strategies while portraying Labor’s as calculated and effective, skewing toward a critical viewpoint of right-leaning political parties and reinforcing opinions against them.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: