Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Labour government secures landmark trade deal with India, but faces backlash over worker exemptions

In a significant development for post-Brexit Britain, the Labour government has finalized a major trade agreement with India, projected to boost bilateral trade by £25.5 billion. This deal, heralded as 'landmark' by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, includes critical tariff reductions on popular UK products such as whisky, gin, and cosmetics, while easing import barriers on Indian textiles and food. This trade agreement could greatly enhance the UK economy, bringing in an estimated £4.8 billion annually by 2040. However, the deal is marred by controversy, particularly regarding exemptions for temporary Indian workers from National Insurance contributions. Trade Secretary Kemi Badenoch, who previously refused to sign the deal during her tenure, has raised concerns over these exemptions. Critics from the Labour party accuse her of attempting to create a 'manufactured controversy' over what they claim is a standard tax agreement aimed at benefiting British workers abroad. The trade agreement comes at a time when the UK is coping with various geopolitical challenges, including struggling to secure a similar pact with the United States. With India projected to become the fourth largest economy globally, the significance of this trade deal cannot be understated. However, ongoing domestic political disputes showcase the friction between Labour and Conservative parties over the terms of the deal, especially regarding immigration and worker rights. Notably, Labour officials argue that the exemptions are similar to those in agreements with over fifty other countries. As discussions unfold regarding potential parliamentary approval and the specifics of the deal, both parties will continue to scrutinize the implications and actual benefits derived from this significant economic partnership with one of the world's fastest-growing markets.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
70/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from   10   different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article reflects a considerable bias due to its critical tone towards the Labour government's handling of the trade deal, particularly the references to Sir Keir Starmer 'blowing it' over the National Insurance contributions issue. Also, the framing of the Conservative party's response as a distraction suggests an underlying judgment against their opposition. The language used more closely aligns with an editorial stance, emphasizing conflict and controversy rather than providing a balanced view of the deal's potential benefits and challenges.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: