Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Jordanian National Charged After Allegedly Attempting to Open Emergency Exit on Sydney-Bound Flight

A 46-year-old Jordanian man faces serious charges after allegedly trying to open the emergency exit doors of an AirAsia X flight from Kuala Lumpur to Sydney on Saturday. The incident unfolded while the flight was airborne, prompting crew to intervene after the man first attempted to open the rear emergency exit and later the middle exit. Witnesses report that he was subsequently restrained by both crew and passengers, during which an airline staff member sustained injury as a result of the confrontation. Australian Federal Police (AFP) arrested the man upon the flight's landing at Sydney Airport, where he is expected to appear in court. He faces two counts of endangering the safety of an aircraft and one count of assaulting an aircraft crew member, with each charge carrying a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. The AFP's Detective Acting Superintendent Davina Copelin highlighted the gravity of such actions, emphasizing that passengers and crew must not endure violence or unruly behavior during flights. AirAsia X assured that they take all necessary precautions to maintain safety onboard, reiterating their zero tolerance policy towards disruptive behavior. Interestingly, this event follows a similar incident on a Jetstar flight, underlining a troubling trend of disruptive passenger behavior in recent aviation news. The frequency of such occurrences raises questions about passenger behavior norms and the effectiveness of current protocols in maintaining safety during flights. The airlines' robust response, including staff training for such emergency situations demonstrates a commitment to passenger safety, but the incidents also necessitate a review of broader societal factors contributing to such dangerous actions in the confined and high-pressure environment of an airplane.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
25/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  18  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article primarily centers on factual reporting of the incident, including charges and official statements, with minimal opinion or emotive language. However, there is some bias in framing the passenger's actions as inherently dangerous without exploring any potential underlying factors contributing to such behavior, indicating a slight bias towards alarmism in reporting about in-flight incidents.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: