Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Jobless Federal Workers Surge as Elon Musk’s D.O.G.E Slashes U.S. Government Agencies

In an unprecedented move, Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (D.O.G.E) has accelerated layoffs among U.S. federal workers following President Trump’s re-election in January 2025. According to Indeed, job applications from workers affected by D.O.G.E have surged by 75% compared to 2022. This transition is unlike previous administrations, impacting experienced professionals with an average tenure of 11 years in their jobs, heightening fears of a recession. Economist Claudia Sahm, referencing the Sahm Rule, expresses concern over the rapid layoffs potentially triggering a downturn. Claudia notes that the pace of these changes has amplified economic risks, posing challenges not just for affected workers but for the economy at large. The Department of Government Efficiency’s tactics have resulted in increased uncertainty among government employees and external entities reliant on government contracts. Companies and educational institutions like Stanford University are already freezing hiring due to this uncertainty. The broad range of unemployed federal workers includes specialists from various fields, complicating their job search in a cooling labor market, especially as traditional and remote-friendly roles dwindle. It remains critical to monitor regional job markets, which are showing varying recovery paths post-pandemic. While some workers might not find immediate positions, the breadth of layoffs increases the probability of heightened unemployment. The swift and unplanned nature of these layoffs, compared to strategic, phased reductions during prior administrations, amplifies risks to both the workforce and the economy.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
70/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  24  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article carries a significant bias, particularly against the D.O.G.E initiatives and Trump’s administration. It amplifies potential negative outcomes and focuses heavily on the adverse effects and uncertainties induced by the layoffs, with less emphasis on potential benefits or alternative perspectives. The language suggests an alarmist tone, assuming worst-case scenarios without equal presentation of government intentions or measures potentially mitigating these risks.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: