Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Jeremy Renner turns down Hawkeye Season 2 over salary dispute with Disney

In a revealing episode of 'The High Performance Podcast,' Jeremy Renner discussed his decision to decline an offer from Disney for a second season of the 'Hawkeye' series. He stated that he was offered only half of his original salary from Season 1, prompting him to express disappointment over the terms presented by the company. Renner, known for his role as Clint Barton, articulated his feelings of being undervalued, jokingly questioning if his recent near-fatal snowplow accident influenced their decision. This incident, which resulted in significant injuries and lengthy recovery, has understandably shifted his perspective on work commitment and value. Renner noted, 'It's going to take me twice the amount of work for half the amount of money,' highlighting the improbability of his acceptance under those terms. He further clarified that the offer was not from Marvel directly, but rather from Disney’s accounting department, which he referred to as 'penny pinchers.' Renner, who still expresses a desire to portray Hawkeye, suggested that defending his worth was necessary amidst what he deemed an insult to his contribution. This situation echoes prior controversies in Hollywood, such as Scarlett Johansson's legal battles with Disney over similar financial disputes tied to the simultaneous release of 'Black Widow.' Currently, Disney has not issued a formal comment on the matter. While Hailee Steinfeld is expected to move forward as the lead in any new 'Hawkeye' endeavors, the future remains uncertain for Renner amid ongoing discussions and production timelines for upcoming Marvel projects like 'Avengers: Doomsday.' Renner's continuing recovery and experiences reveal a deeper conversation around actor compensation and health considerations in an industry favoring its business objectives. This saga raises questions about how major studios value actors and their contributions, especially during times of crisis. The juxtaposition of Renner's health recovery against his unwillingness to compromise on salary reflects an evolving industry dynamic where artist welfare is increasingly at stake in commercial decisions. As audiences, it’s vital to acknowledge and advocate for equitable treatment and respect for talents behind beloved characters, which holds implications for the larger narrative within the entertainment industry.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
60/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from   19   different sources.
Bias Assessment: The reporting primarily features Renner as a victim of corporate financial decisions, framing Disney as the antagonist, which leans towards favoring Renner's perspective. While the report presents factual statements, it employs emotional language (e.g., 'an insult offer') that stirs sympathy, thus adding a level of bias against the corporate entity involved. There is also a potential bias due to Renner's injuries being highlighted, as this can skew public perception. The absence of a detailed response from Disney contributes to a one-sided narrative.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: