Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Italian Scientists Claim Discovery of Lost City Beneath Egyptian Pyramids

Italian Scientists Claim Discovery of Lost City Beneath Egyptian Pyramids

A significant revelation has emerged as a group of Italian researchers announces the discovery of a possible lost city beneath the Egyptian pyramids. The team, consisting of Corrado Malanga, Filippo Biondi, and Armando Mei, had previously detected substantial structures thousands of feet below the surface. This startling claim follows an earlier assertion made in March, where they purportedly located secret chambers beneath the Khafre Pyramid.

Despite their ambitious findings, the credibility of the researchers has been met with skepticism. Experts in the field have openly dismissed their claims, arguing that current ground-penetrating radar technology is not capable of surveying depths of such magnitude. According to the Italian scientists, they utilized radar pulses which led them to identify structures resembling 2,000-foot vertical cylinders under the Khafre Pyramid, asserting the presence of eight such formations outfitted with spiral-like features.

In their latest announcement, the researchers assert that similar structures have now been uncovered beneath the Pyramid of Menkaure, the smallest of the three prominent pyramids in Giza. They speculate that these findings indicate the existence of an underground city intertwined with the pyramids, suggesting an intricate network of chambers, pipes, and a sophisticated water system culminating in cube-shaped structures.

Biondi stated that there is a 90 percent likelihood that the Menkaure and Khafre pyramids share a common structural foundation, further substantiating their belief in an interconnected network. Despite the compelling nature of their claims, their study has yet to undergo peer review or make its way into an academic publication, raising potential concerns about its validity. Archaeologist Dr. Zahi Hawass vehemently criticized the discovery, labeling it as “bu****it,” and accentuating the prevailing doubts about the veracity of these claims.

The Giza complex, encompassing the iconic Khufu, Khafre, and Menkaure pyramids along with the Great Sphinx, continues to captivate the interest of historians and archaeologists alike, who remain puzzled over the methods employed in constructing these monumental, astronomically aligned edifices. The Italian team's assertions point to an elusive megastructure that eludes the eye, potentially holding critical clues to our understanding of these ancient marvels.

Biondi and his colleagues firmly believe that their discoveries reveal not merely archaeological remnants but suggest the presence of a vast underground complex, or "megastucture", hidden beneath the sands of Giza. They have reasoned that the Giza structures are interconnected, which they propose signifies that the pyramids only represent the surface of a much larger infrastructural system.

Furthermore, they argue that these hidden structures may date back roughly 38,000 years, significantly older than the pyramids, which are about 4,500 years old. They posit that the pyramids were constructed by a more advanced prehistoric civilization, which they speculate was decimated by a comet impact approximately 12,800 years ago.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
65/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from   19   different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article presents a mix of claims and skepticism surrounding the findings of the Italian researchers without extensive coverage of expert consensus. This creates a sense of imbalance, leaning towards sensationalism regarding the potential discoveries. Further, the quotations from various experts reflect a partiality, showcasing the conflict between the researchers and established archaeologists.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: