Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Israel's blockade of Gaza criticized in International Court of Justice hearings

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has been hearing testimonies regarding Israel's actions in Gaza, particularly its extensive blockade that has restricted any goods, including vital humanitarian aid, from entering the territory. As Israel's blockade hits the 60-day mark, the humanitarian conditions in Gaza have deteriorated, leading the United Nations to issue severe warnings of impending famine. The UN's World Food Programme has indicated that there is no food left for distribution to the charity kitchens serving half of Gaza's population, while bakeries have shut down due to shortages of flour and fuel. Reports suggest that over 52,000 Palestinians have died since hostilities escalated on October 7, 2023. Amid these dire conditions, the United States has defended Israel's right to selectively engage with aid organizations like UNRWA, which Israel accuses of being infiltrated by Hamas. Testimonies from more than 40 countries during the ICJ hearings predominantly criticized Israel's actions, with the Palestinian ambassador accusing Israel of turning Gaza into a 'mass grave.' Meanwhile, significant concerns have been raised about the lack of medical supplies, with hospitals overwhelmed and conditions worsening daily. The contrasting perspectives between Israel's justification for its blockade and the international community's condemnation highlight the deep divisions in responses to the humanitarian crisis. Critics argue this situation underscores a broader failure of international law to protect innocent lives caught in conflict.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
70/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from   11   different sources.
Bias Assessment: The coverage leans heavily towards highlighting the humanitarian impact and suffering in Gaza, presenting the crisis from the perspective of Palestinian civilians and international condemnations of Israel. The framing poses the blockade in extremely negative terms without providing ample context or counter-arguments from the Israeli perspective, minimizing the complexity of the security concerns expressed by Israel. Such framing contributes to a perceived bias against Israel in this report.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: