Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

India Conducts 'Operation Sindoor' Against Pakistan Following Pahalgam Terror Attack

In a significant escalation of military tensions between India and Pakistan, India launched 'Operation Sindoor' early on May 7, targeting nine sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir that are believed to support terrorist activities. This operation was a direct response to a recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir, which left 26 civilians dead, garnering widespread outrage in India. Prime Minister Narendra Modi framed these strikes as a measured response to safeguard national security, asserting that India demonstrated restraint by avoiding direct military targets. However, Pakistan's military has countered these claims, stating it shot down five Indian aircraft and asserting that civilian infrastructure was also impacted during the strikes, which reportedly resulted in multiple civilian casualties. Pakistan's response includes a declaration of an 'ongoing situation' and threats of retaliation against any further incursions. Both sides have engaged in a war of narratives, with Pakistan labeling India's military actions as a violation of sovereignty and committing to a decisive response. The international community, including the UN, has expressed concern over the potential for further escalation between these two nuclear-armed states. As regional tensions rise, the implications extend beyond just military responses, affecting diplomatic relations and regional stability. The situation remains critical, with both governments preparing for potential further conflict amidst mutual accusations of aggression and a lack of evidence substantiating claims of cross-border terrorism.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
75/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from   21   different sources.
Bias Assessment: The news reflects a substantial bias due to the emotional language used by both sides, particularly in the framing of military actions as retaliatory and defensive versus aggressive and unprovoked. Both Indian and Pakistani government officials are quoted extensively, presenting narratives that favor their respective positions without a balanced view from independent observers, leading to a heightened perception of bias.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: