Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Independent Braddon MP Craig Garland will move a motion calling for a referendum on Hobart’s Macquarie Point stadium when Parliament reconvenes in early May.

In a significant political move, Independent Braddon MP Craig Garland is set to advocate for a referendum regarding the controversial Macquarie Point stadium project in Hobart. This initiative comes amid growing dissatisfaction, as Garland states that approximately 65% of his constituents oppose the stadium, emphasizing a need for a democratic approach to determine the project's social license. His comments reflect alarm over a debt crisis that Tasmanians are facing and raise questions about prioritizing funding for an expensive sporting venue over existing community needs. The Tasmanian government intends to expedite the project through special legislation, bypassing typical planning processes. Premier Jeremy Rockliff argues that the stadium will create plenty of jobs and stimulate the local economy, referring to it as an 'enabler' for various sectors, including hospitality and transport. However, Garland counters that this rush to build is indicative of a government pushing through decisions without proper public consent, undermining the principles of democracy, particularly in a minority government where the mandate is questioned. The decision triggers debate regarding Tasmania's contractual obligations with the AFL — particularly the demands for a roofed stadium by 2029 as a condition for establishing a local team. Garland suggests that renegotiation with the AFL is necessary to prevent imposing further financial burdens on the state. This political standoff illustrates the contentious atmosphere surrounding the project and reflects a broader conflict between governmental priorities and community sentiments. It invites citizens to weigh in, and Garland's proposal for a referendum underscores the importance of public engagement in decision-making processes that impact state resources and community welfare.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
70/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  25  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The coverage shows a significant bias against the stadium project primarily through the perspectives of opposition voices, especially those highlighted in Craig Garland's statements. The focus on community opposition and financial concerns suggests a leaning towards anti-stadium sentiments. However, the perspective offered by the Premier regarding economic benefits isn't given as much prominence, resulting in an imbalance that skews the narrative towards skepticism regarding the government's push for the stadium.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: