In his first 100 days, the president has taken a sledgehammer to institutions and the constitution. We can only guess what’s next

As the political landscape rapidly evolves under the new administration, critics are increasingly vocal about perceived assaults on foundational democratic institutions. In the first 100 days, the president has implemented a series of controversial policies and executive orders that many view as a direct challenge to established norms and constitutional protections. Critics argue that these actions reflect a troubling trend towards authoritarian governance, where checks and balances are undermined in favor of unilateral executive power. Analysts suggest that this pattern could have long-term implications for the political stability and democratic integrity of the nation. During this initial phase in office, several actions, including attempts to undermine judicial independence and pressure legislative bodies, have sparked significant concern. Moreover, the administration’s rhetoric often undermines public trust in established institutions, suggesting a deliberate strategy of delegitimization. Many commentators fear that the president’s approach may galvanize opposition but could also lead to increased polarization within the electorate. In terms of public sentiment, diverse polls reveal a split among citizens, with many supporting the president's agenda while an equal number express deep unease about the erosion of democratic norms. This duality underscores the current political climate, wherein the president's base remains fiercely loyal, contrasting sharply with widespread skepticism from opponents. As we look ahead, the uncertainty surrounding future legislative and executive actions leaves many questions unanswered. The trajectory this administration chooses could either fortify or further weaken the pillars of democracy.