Google is set to replace Assistant with Gemini on Wear OS, but what does it really mean?

In a significant move for the landscape of wearable technology, Google is progressing towards the implementation of its Gemini AI assistant across the Wear OS platform. Spotted within the code of the latest Assistant app, this transition has generated excitement but also skepticism among users and tech observers alike. Launched as a straightforward app update, Gemini is anticipated to replace the aging Google Assistant, essentially altering how users interact with their wearable tech. However, as the code suggests, it appears that this update largely serves as a rebranding rather than a substantial feature enhancement. Users will still utilize familiar functions like setting timers and messaging contacts, with features notably staying the same. The true capabilities of Gemini on Wear OS remain uncertain, and it is yet unclear whether it will include more advanced functionalities such as access to Gmail or Google Maps. The timing of this transition is particularly intriguing, as it could coincide with the unveiling of new hardware, specifically a potential Pixel Watch 4. With Google I/O approaching, it's expected that we could hear more insights into Wear OS developments. However, the technological limitations of current Wear OS devices are pressing concerns – AI features require significant resources, and the constrained specs of most smartwatches could hinder Gemini from performing at its potential. Moreover, the rebranding to Gemini is not without potential drawbacks; alongside the disclaimer that Gemini 'can make mistakes', users may find themselves navigating a platform that does not drastically elevate their experience beyond what Google Assistant currently offers. There are hints in the code that suggest enhanced communication between the Pixel Watch and apps, yet whether that will manifest meaningfully on current hardware remains questionable. On another note, there's also mention of a 'Raise to Talk' feature, suggesting a shift towards more intuitive interaction methods that could potentially improve on existing activation frustrations seen with current voice assistants. Yet, this feature’s seeming dependence on hardware capabilities raises concern about its efficacy and whether it will create a seamless experience or lead to more challenges. As users await these updates, the overarching narrative remains focused on expectations; there’s hope for a fresh take on user interaction with AI via smartwatch technology, but whether Gemini will adequately meet those expectations in its initial rollout is still an open question. Users are encouraged to remain vigilant as this transition unfolds, and the potential for enhanced experiences through updated AI capabilities is certainly appealing—albeit with some reservations about the limits of existing technology.