Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Germany's New Parliament Convenes After Election, Bringing Major Shifts in Power

Germany's federal election on February 23 has brought significant change to the political landscape. The end of Chancellor Olaf Scholz's center-left government marks a new era as Friedrich Merz of the CDU is poised to take the helm as chancellor. Julia Klöckner, previously Germany's agriculture minister under Angela Merkel, has been selected to serve as the Bundestag president, a role critical in managing parliamentary procedures. With the AfD gaining significant influence as a far-right party, Klöckner faces challenges maintaining decorum given the notable increase in parliamentary warnings primarily attributed to AfD actions. The rise of the AfD, now the second-largest party in the Bundestag, reflects broader European trends of growing far-right influence, posing challenges for coalition building. Throughout, coalition talks between the CDU/CSU and SPD reveal a landscape fraught with political divides over issues including taxes, social welfare, and migration policy. Despite these hurdles, Merz has expressed optimism about forming a cohesive government. An illustrative factor in the shifting representative dynamics is that the Bundestag remains somewhat misaligned with national demographics, particularly in gender and youth representation. This session started with a contentious landscape as both leftist and far-right parties control a significant portion of the seats, presenting potential roadblocks in crafting constitutional changes or affirming national policies. The evolving narrative in Germany underscores the broader European context where political extremities converge and evolve.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
35/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  25  different sources.
Bias Assessment: While the news provides a surface-level fair representation of events, there is a noticeable focus on the difficulties posed by the far-right AfD and a portrayal of ongoing challenges in coalition governance. The article notes specific parliamentary behaviors and election outcomes with more negative connotations towards the AfD. This could suggest moderate bias, leaning towards critical reporting on conservative and far-right movements, while favorably representing Merz's efforts to build a government. The explicit mention of demographic disparities in the Bundestag and emphasis on party challenges indicates a nuanced, yet perceptibly slanted assessment.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: