Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Federal Judge Halts Trump Administration's Attempt to End NYC Congestion Pricing Program

Federal Judge Halts Trump's Efforts Against NYC Congestion Pricing

A federal judge in Manhattan has temporarily blocked the U.S. Department of Transportation from retaliating against the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) following the agency's decision to maintain tolls for congestion pricing. This ruling serves to neutralize much of the leverage previously held by the Trump administration to terminate the tolling program, which was implemented on January 5. The program currently charges a daytime fee of $9 for vehicles entering Manhattan south of 60th Street.

The ruling came from U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman, who issued a temporary restraining order, effectively halting the Trump administration's ongoing efforts to dismantle the congestion pricing initiative. In the latest warning issued by the Federal Highway Administration, the MTA was given a deadline of May 28 to cease the tolling or face significant cuts to both city and state highway funding.

Judge Liman emphasized that the federal government is prohibited from withholding any of these funds until the ongoing lawsuit filed by the MTA regarding the toll program is resolved. In the courtroom, MTA attorney Roberta Kaplan argued that the federal government could not retract approval for the congestion pricing, noting that it represented an agreement for cooperation with New York state, independent of the current presidential administration.

“It would be a recipe for chaos,

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
0/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from   24   different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article maintains a mostly neutral tone, focusing on the judicial process without displaying outright favor for either side. However, it leans slightly toward the MTA's perspective by emphasizing the benefits of congestion pricing and the judge's ruling positively. Thus, a score of 30 indicates minimal bias.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: