Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Federal Court Temporarily Restores Immigration Status of Dartmouth PhD Student Xiaotian Liu Amid Controversial Visa Revocations

On April 9, a federal court in New Hampshire reinstated the F-1 student immigration status of Xiaotian Liu, a Chinese doctoral student at Dartmouth College. This ruling occurred just days after the U.S. Department of Homeland Security revoked Liu's visa, citing concerns tied to anti-Israel protests on U.S. campuses. The decision to reverse the visa revocation has sparked significant discussion across college campuses, raising questions about the Trump administration's broader policies affecting international students. Liu's legal team, represented by the ACLU of New Hampshire and a local law firm, argued that the revocation was 'unlawful' and a violation of due process. The court's temporary restoration means Liu can continue his studies and work while awaiting a final ruling on the lawsuit seeking permanent restoration of his immigration status. The situation reflects a growing climate of fear among international students, especially those from Muslim-majority countries, who feel increasingly targeted by U.S. immigration policies. As universities express their commitment to support their international communities, the case of Liu highlights the delicate intersection of immigration policy and academic freedom.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
70/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  12  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The coverage disproportionately focuses on the negative impacts of the Trump administration's policies on international students, particularly those from specific ethnic backgrounds while presenting the judicial response as a victory for human rights. This framing may suggest a bias towards prioritizing student rights over national security concerns, stemming from a growing trend in media narratives emphasizing social justice issues.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: