Experts say Pentagon chief has endangered secrets of US defense department and given assistance to foreign spies

In a developing story that raises serious concerns about national security, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is facing scrutiny following revelations that he allegedly shared military attack plans via private, unsecure communications. Defense expert and former military lawyer, Lt. Col. Mick Wagoner, has stated that the information Hegseth shared was almost certainly classified, challenging the validity of Hegseth’s claims that the details were unclassified and merely informal. Hegseth defended his actions during a Fox News appearance, downplaying the implications of sharing such sensitive information with unauthorized individuals, including family and aides. This situation is troubling from a national security standpoint, particularly in the context of global military operations where the element of surprise is vital. Retired Army officer and CIA member Kevin Carroll remarked that what Hegseth did extends beyond mere spillage of classified information; it could be interpreted as a willful act of negligence, which could attract legal scrutiny from the Department of Justice. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Dan Caine, seemed uncomfortable with the implications of Hegseth's actions during his confirmation hearing, indicating that protecting military secrets is paramount. The outrage has sparked bipartisan calls for Hegseth’s resignation, although President Trump has publicly supported him amid accusations of leaks from disgruntled staff members. Amidst an already turbulent environment at the Pentagon, former spokesperson John Ullyot described the current regime beneath Hegseth as a 'full-blown meltdown,' blaming infighting and potential leaks for ongoing crises. Hegseth’s defenders assert that the blame lies with former staffers who have been expelled under suspicion of leaking sensitive information to the media. This incident illustrates broader systemic issues within the military and political framework regarding the handling of classified information. Laws enacted to protect sensitive information have been compromised in various administrations, thus creating a narrative of perceived impunity among high-ranking officials. Experts are questioning whether Hegseth will face genuine consequences given the historical precedent of leniency towards similar conduct among senior officials from both parties. As the situation evolves, it poses questions not only about Hegseth's fitness to lead but also the existing protocols surrounding the communication of classified materials. This ordeal could have long-lasting implications for military operations and personnel morale, as indicated by discussions surrounding 'different spanks for different ranks'—a phrase that underscores the frustrations over perceived injustice within the ranks of military personnel.