Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Death of a Unicorn: A B-Movie Fantasy with Generational Commentary

The film 'Death of a Unicorn' seems to bridge a gap between moral children's fantasy and midnight-movie violence, offering a peculiar cocktail of CGI unicorns and familial drama. Paul Rudd stars as Elliot Kintner, whose life takes an unexpected turn when he accidentally strikes a baby unicorn belonging to the wealthy Leopold family—a fictional dynasty reminiscent of the Sackler family. The film's creative team includes writer-director Alex Scharfman, who injects a modern and satirical twist into a classic horror template. His endeavor reflects a critique of generational differences through the Leopold family's dynamics. The thematic undertones paint the Leopold patriarch as a symbol of relentless Boomer ambition, juxtaposed with his flawed family—a liberal Gen Xer wife and a tech-savvy millennial son—alluding to Scharfman's expectation that Generation Z, represented by Kintner's daughter Ridley, can guide us in a new direction. A24, known for its roster of unique horror films like 'The Witch' and 'Hereditary', backs 'Death of a Unicorn,' returning to its storytelling formula of assembling unwary participants in secluded locales for eventual mayhem. While the movie garners some predictability, with its adherence to venerable horror tropes, it still provides intriguing aspects such as Jenna Ortega's portrayal of Ridley. Ridley, a Gen Z emblem, bypasses typical tropes by focusing on her stark dismissal of material security in favor of basic human survival. Scharfman's piece offers narrative layers wrapped in a hypnotic blend of entertainment and mild satire, capturing viewers intrigued by a fresh horror take or perhaps those searching for implicit societal critique veiled with mythical creatures. It's a film that seems aligned more for the younger generation, or at least those still in touch with youthful earnestness, ready to challenge established structures. However, the notion that youth alone can redefine our path is optimistic yet naive, echoing a tale as old as time. This movie's approach in addressing such generational themes while operating under a familiar B-movie rubric makes it worth a watch, if not for sheer entertainment, then for its subtle commentary.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
75/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  15  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article appears to carry a moderate bias, primarily influenced by its critical analysis of different generations through the lens of the film. The use of loaded terms like 'delusional' or 'hedonistic' in describing generational traits leans towards a judgmental perspective, albeit one that aligns with common societal narratives. The writer's tone exhibits awareness and criticism, particularly towards older generations while perhaps overly idealistic regarding Gen Z. This tone can evoke a skewed interpretation of generational dynamics. Despite these biases, the praise of certain film elements, such as performances and production choices, provides some balance in the overall analysis. Consequently, the Bias Score is assigned based on these thematic biases interwoven throughout the critique.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: