Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Australia Warned on Trump's Tariffs Impacting AUKUS Submarine Costs

In a significant development concerning the AUKUS defense pact, Australia has been cautioned that tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump could raise costs for submarines being acquired from the United States. Senator Tim Kaine highlighted how the tariffs already affect crucial materials like steel and aluminum sourced from allies, raising concerns over delays and budget overruns for the delivery of Virginia-class submarines, which are crucial for Australian defense. The AUKUS agreement, estimated to cost Australian taxpayers $368 billion over the next 30 years, involves Australia purchasing three Virginia-class submarines and constructing five nuclear-powered attack submarines domestically. However, both Kaine and former British defense secretary Michael Fallon expressed that the second pillar of AUKUS, based on sharing military technology and data, suffers from a lack of focus and direction. They suggested narrowing the scope to more manageable tasks. Kaine emphasized the need for more decisive collaboration, given the urgent need to counter increasing geopolitical competition, particularly from China. Meanwhile, the Biden administration's recognition of Australia's support to its defense industry raises questions about the long-term implications of trade policies between allies. The ongoing trade war rhetoric, particularly the equal treatment of Australia with countries like Iran, has emerged as a point of contention among U.S. lawmakers, potentially straining historical ties. As Australia gears up to enhance its own defense capabilities, it will need to balance these international relationships with its domestic industrial goals.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
60/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  10  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The article demonstrates a moderate bias, primarily in its focus on criticizing Trump's tariff policies and their implications on an allied nation. It leans towards portraying the tariffs negatively and emphasizes the frustrations among lawmakers regarding the bureaucratic inefficiencies in the AUKUS pact. While it presents factual information, the tone suggests a critical view of U.S. trade policy and highlights the consequences for Australia. This perspective may influence readers' understanding of the broader geopolitical implications without presenting a fully neutral viewpoint.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: