Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

At the End of March 2025, the Global Financial Markets Experienced Severe Turmoil

March 2025 saw a dramatic downturn in global financial markets, marked prominently by significant declines in the U.S. stock market and subsequent spillovers into the cryptocurrency markets. On March 28, termed 'Black Friday,' the U.S. stock indices suffered substantial drops: the S&P 500 declined by 1.97%, the Nasdaq by 2.7%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged by 715 points, a 1.69% decrease. This downturn reverberated strongly in the cryptocurrency sphere, seeing Bitcoin drop from $84,000 to $81,565 over just a couple of days. Ethereum and Solana also saw marked reductions in value, reflecting the broad impact across financial sectors. According to data from Coinglass, the rapid devaluation led to the liquidation of around 70,000 cryptocurrency investors over two days, with reported losses estimated at $200 million. The article explores the interconnectedness of these markets, revealing heightened risk aversion among investors concerning risk assets, suggesting this may be a response to broader economic vulnerabilities. The situation was exacerbated by macroeconomic indicators. U.S. inflationary pressures continued, as indicated by an unexpected rise in the February core Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) index. Concerns over persistent inflation contributed to Goldman Sachs revising its 2025 GDP growth forecast downward and raising recession probabilities. Concurrently, statements from Federal Reserve officials about maintaining high-interest rates further fueled market apprehension. A significant element of the market destabilization appears linked to the anticipated reciprocal tariff plan from the Trump administration, set for official announcement on April 2. Heightened tariffs could average 15% on all trading partners according to Goldman Sachs, potentially prompting global trade retaliations, driving up import costs, and instigating further market unease. This aspect is highlighted given its asymmetrical potential to influence market trajectories, heralding further volatility. As the imminent results of key economic reports unfold, the commitment to hawkish monetary policies suggests further implications amid this rising tension. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's upcoming address, the ECB's policy meeting minutes, and the U.S. non-farm payroll report are pivotal in unfolding these dynamics further, with intrinsic consequences for both stock and crypto markets underscored by systemic volatility. Microsoft's 50th anniversary could also play a role in market sentiments depending on announcements related to its AI ventures. While short-term turbulence is expected, long-term projections, particularly concerning cryptocurrencies, suggest potential resilience, conditional on regulatory evolutions and institutional acceptance. Galaxy Research forecasts a bullish long-term trajectory for Bitcoin and Ethereum, contingent upon improved regulatory climates and broader institutional endorsements. Such sentiments juxtapose immediate concerns while offering a more optimistic outlook for cryptocurrencies when traditional markets stabilize.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
70/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from  15  different sources.
Bias Assessment: The bias score reflects a noticeable inclination towards attributing market downturns to specific political actions such as Trump's tariff policies while emphasizing speculative predictions in the cryptocurrency markets. There's a contrast between immediate economic concerns and long-term value attributions to crypto assets, which adds a speculative bias to the analysis. This score suggests the analysis weighs heavily on certain economic forecasters and anticipates outcomes primarily influenced by expected policy adjustments, rather than accounting for all potential influencing factors equally.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: