Saved articles

You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!

Browse articles
Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

At least seven people killed and 20 injured in bombing of MSF hospital in South Sudan

In a recent attack on the MSF (Doctors Without Borders) hospital located in Old Fangak, South Sudan, at least seven individuals were reported dead, including a 9-month-old child. The bombing occurred early in the morning, with eyewitness accounts detailing the use of helicopter gunships that targeted the hospital, marking a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict between government forces and opposition groups. This incident has raised alarms amid fears that South Sudan is teetering on the brink of renewed civil war, particularly following the collapse of a power-sharing agreement between President Salva Kiir and First Vice-President Riek Machar. The hospital had been providing essential medical services to about 40,000 residents, many of whom have been displaced due to flooding and ongoing violence. MSF condemned the bombing as a blatant violation of international humanitarian law, highlighting the destructive impact on healthcare facilities in a country already suffering from a dire humanitarian crisis. The Fangak County Commissioner attributed the attacks to the government forces, underscoring the ethnic tensions that underpin the ongoing conflict. As political instability continues to escalate, multiple embassies, including the United States, have expressed concern about the deteriorating situation, urging a return to dialogue and political resolution. The attack on such a critical medical facility not only highlights the immediate danger faced by civilians and healthcare workers but also exacerbates fears of a humanitarian catastrophe in a region already crippled by violence and instability.

Bias Analysis

Bias Score:
75/100
Neutral Biased
This news has been analyzed from   22   different sources.
Bias Assessment: The coverage tends to be critical of the South Sudanese government, highlighting its role in the violence and the implications for civilian safety. By emphasizing the humanitarian impact and the violation of international law, the narrative seems to align with a more sympathetic view of the opposition and humanitarian organizations, suggesting a bias towards highlighting government actions over those in opposition. Additionally, the emotional appeal of innocent casualties, like the 9-month-old child, further skews the reporting towards an anti-government stance while framing the situation within a broader narrative of oppression and humanitarian crisis.

Key Questions About This Article

Think and Consider

Related to this topic: