Editor’s Note: This article has been updated to clarify that it was Elections Alberta with which Forever Canada claims to have filed its paperwork, and to elucidate changes proposed in Bill 54.
A newly formed group of Albertans, named Forever Canada, has taken a proactive stance against the rising sentiment for provincial separation from Canada by filing for a referendum petition approval. The group aims to present a clear question to the public: “Do you agree that Alberta must remain in Canada, and that any form of separation should be rejected?”
Thomas Lukaszuk, a former deputy premier within Alison Redford’s Progressive Conservative government, has emphasized the need for a measured representation in the separation debate. He asserts that the majority of Albertans would prefer to stay united with Canada, highlighting his own personal journey as a refugee who has grown to cherish the country over the last 45 years. "We should be strong and forceful in reaffirming our commitment to our country — to Canada,” he stated.
The political landscape in Alberta has seen notable shifts following the recent federal elections, which saw the Liberal Party maintaining power despite losing significantly in the province. Post-election, Alberta's United Conservative Party (UCP), led by Premier Danielle Smith, introduced Bill 54, the Election Statutes Amendment Act, aimed at reshaping election rules to facilitate referendums. If passed, this bill will alter the petition requirements from requiring signatures from 20% of registered voters to just 10% of the total votes cast in the previous general election, while also extending the collection period from 90 to 120 days.
While Premier Smith has distanced herself from the idea of separation, she has acknowledged Alberta's grievances against Ottawa's policies, especially regarding the oil and gas industry. She has constructed a series of demands directed at Prime Minister Mark Carney to address these concerns over the next six months, signaling a strained relationship with the federal government.
Echoing the growing divisiveness, Cameron Davies, recently appointed leader of the Republican Party of Alberta and a former UCP member, has chastised Lukaszuk’s petition, labeling it “sad” and “pathetic.” He has argued that referendums on fundamental questions should originate from government initiatives, rather than citizen-led efforts, implying that there is a lack of political courage within the current government to raise such an essential issue.
Constitutional law expert Eric Adams has weighed in, suggesting that the provincial government faces a turbulent period as it grapples with easing the path for citizen-driven referendums. He warns of significant instability as the government currently lacks a clear directive on Alberta’s role within the Canadian federation.
Lukaszuk characterized the petition filing as a tactical move in a strategic game over Alberta’s future political orientation. He noted that many citizens are prepared to sign for pro-separatist petitions, especially in light of the changes suggested in Bill 54. The focal point now remains on who will take the lead in this discourse and what questions will ultimately be posed to Albertans.
Concerns have also been voiced from leaders within Alberta's business sector regarding the wish for a referendum on separation. The president of the Calgary Chamber of Commerce, Deborah Yedlin, articulated a shared apprehension that such a move could endanger not only Alberta’s economy but the national economy as a whole, as businesses thrive on predictability and stability.
Additionally, First Nations leaders have expressed worries about the ramifications of Bill 54 and the separatist movement regarding their treaty rights. Eric Adams highlighted that should a majority back separation, Alberta's government would likely feel compelled to engage in protracted negotiations with Ottawa and other provinces, which could lead to a complicated and turbulent phase in the province's political history, with unresolved issues relating to national parks, currency, and citizenship hanging in the balance.
Meanwhile, emerging sentiments and potential solutions to support the socioeconomic needs of Albertans have surfaced through the Alberta Federation of Labour’s new “Worker Agenda.” This approach emphasizes a range of proposals, from a $20 minimum wage to public auto insurance and regulating power prices, reflecting a significant public appeal that diverges from the separatist narrative.
In conclusion, while the call for Alberta's independence generates considerable conversation and concern, recent polling reveals that a majority of Albertans remain steadfast in their opposition to separation, favoring a united approach to address pressing issues such as wages, affordability, and overall governance.
Bias Analysis
Key Questions About This Article
